A low-cost, DIY tourniquet simulator with built-in self-assessment for prehospital providers in Guatemala city.

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death after trauma. In high-income countries first responders are trained in hemorrhage control techniques but this is not the case for developing countries like Guatemala. We present a low-cost training model for tourniquet application using a combination of virtual and physical components. METHODS: The training program includes a mobile application with didactic materials, videos and a gamified virtual reality environment for learning. Additionally, a physical training model of a bleeding lower extremity is developed allowing learners to practice tourniquet application using inexpensive and accessible materials. Validation of the simulator occurred through content and construct validation. Content validation involved subjective assessments by novices and experts, construct validation compared pre-training novices with experts. Training validation compared pre and post training novices for improvement. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that users found the simulator useful, realistic, and satisfactory. We found significant differences in tourniquet application skills between pre-training novices and experts. When comparing pre- and post-training novices, we found a significantly lower bleeding control time between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that this training approach can enhance access to life-saving skills for prehospital personnel. The inclusion of self-assessment components enables self-regulated learning and reduces the need for continuous instructor presence. Future improvements involve refining the tourniquet model, validating it with first-responder end users, and expanding the training program to include other skills.

A new approach for the acquisition of trauma surgical skills: an OSCE type of simulation training program.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, trauma-related deaths are one of the main causes of mortality. Appropriate surgical treatment is crucial to prevent mortality, however, in the past decade, general surgery residents' exposure to trauma cases has decreased, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, accessible simulation-based training scenarios are essential. METHODS: A low-cost, previously tested OSCE scenario for the evaluation of surgical skills in trauma was implemented as part of a short training boot camp for residents and recently graduated surgeons. The following stations were included bowel anastomosis, vascular anastomosis, penetrating lung injury, penetrating cardiac injury, and gastric perforation (laparoscopic suturing). A total of 75 participants from 15 different programs were recruited. Each station was videotaped in high definition and assessed in a remote and asynchronous manner. The level of competency was assessed through global and specific rating scales alongside procedural times. Self-confidence to perform the procedure as the leading surgeon was evaluated before and after training. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found in pre-training scores between groups for all stations. The lowest scores were obtained in the cardiac and lung injury stations. After training, participants significantly increased their level of competence in both grading systems. Procedural times for the pulmonary tractotomy, bowel anastomosis, and vascular anastomosis stations increased after training. A significant improvement in self-confidence was shown in all stations. CONCLUSION: An OSCE scenario for training surgical skills in trauma was effective in improving proficiency level and self-confidence. Low pre-training scores and level of confidence in the cardiac and lung injury stations represent a deficit in residency programs that should be addressed. The incorporation of simulation-based teaching tools at early stages in residency would be beneficial when future surgeons face extremely severe trauma scenarios.

Assessing the global burden of hemorrhage: The global blood supply, deficits, and potential solutions.

There is a critical shortage of blood available for transfusion in many low- and middle-income countries. The consequences of this scarcity are dire, resulting in uncounted morbidity and mortality from trauma, obstetric hemorrhage, and pediatric anemias, among numerous other conditions. The process of collecting blood from a donor to administering it to a patient involves many facets from donor availability to blood processing to blood delivery. Each step faces particular challenges in low- and middle-income countries. Optimizing existing strategies and introducing new approaches will be imperative to ensure a safe and sufficient blood supply worldwide.

Validity Argument for a Simulation-Based Objective Structured Clinical Examination Scenario for Evaluation of Surgical Skills in Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Trauma is one of the main causes of death globally, and appropriate surgical care is crucial to impact mortality. However, resident-performed trauma cases have diminished in the last 10 years. Simulation-based tools have proven to be effective to evaluate practical skills in a variety of settings. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding proper validation of trauma surgery models. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate under a contemporary validity framework, an objective structured clinical evaluation (OSCE) scenario for the assessment of basic and advanced surgical skills in trauma and emergency surgery. METHODS: An OSCE-type simulation assessment program was developed incorporating six stations representing basic and advanced surgical skills that are essential in trauma surgery. Each station was designed using ex-vivo animal tissue. The stations included basic knots and sutures, bowel resection and anastomosis, vascular end-to-end anastomosis, lung injury repair, cardiac injury repair, and laparoscopic suturing. Eight postgraduate year 2 (PY-2), eight recently graduated surgeons (RGS), and 3 experts were recruited, and their performance was blindly assessed by experts using the validated general rating scale OSATS (Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills) as well as the time taken to complete the procedure. RESULTS: Significant differences were identified among groups. The average OSATS score was 82 for the PY2 group, 113 for the RGS group, and 147 for the experts (P < 0.01). The average procedural time to complete all the stations was 98 minutes for the PY2 group, 68 minutes for the RGS group, and 35 minutes for the expert surgeons (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: An OSCE scenario designed using ex-vivo tissue met 4 out of 5 criteria of the Messick validity framework: content, relation to other variables, response process and consequences of the test. The results show it is a valid strategy for the evaluation of practical skills in trauma surgery.